Style part 2 draft- A Guide to Style (or- how to write things that sound smart, yet can also be understood by others)

*Hi group- specifically I would like to know if you think these are the most important rules to address (I did but I’d like to know if others agree). Are the examples effective?

Of all the aspiring writers and students throughout history, there have been an elite circle of literary geniuses with 1000 watt brains  who have disregarded universal rules of style and clarity in their work. Some of these extra special folks can write 1,800 word sentences and use the poorest of grammar, yet still be regarded as brilliant artists.

Most of us just want to write successfully at work and school. Unfortunately for you, the experts have concluded that the ever-elusive stylishness that enables one to write smoothly, rhythmically, and clearly cannot be taught. Reader, do not despair. There are some basic rules that, if  followed, may improve your writing. It could possibly become A) more clear, B) more effective, C) easier to understand, and/or D) nicer to read.

Rule of Style #1- Consistent Topics

The most important part of your paragraph is its topic, or psychological subject. This means what your reader should be thinking about. If you have too many topics within a paragraph or body of information, this will confuse your reader. They will not know which is the most important at the time.

It would have been better to discuss the removal of Indians further and put the new idea (the imposed government schools) in a new paragraph.

Remember!

Paragraph= One idea + discussion of that idea.

Rule of Style #2- Less is almost always more.

The main goal when writing virtually anything is to be clear. Avoid using overly sophisticated words when unnecessary. Keep sentences fairly short and direct.

Revise for clarity. The phrases in italics in the example are known as nominalizations and meaningless modifiers, basically worthless sequences of words that clog up your paper. Remove these. Keep pronouns to a minimum and remember to use the same tense throughout.

 

Rule of Style #3- Put the most emphatic ideas at the end of your sentences.

Put the most complex or emphatic ideas at the end of sentences. If you do this, you will keep your readers engaged. They will want to know what happens next. Sentences will seem logical and sequential.

Poor examples-

“During lunch the king was shot, though just prior all had been enjoying their finger sandwiches.”

“Hurricanes cause mass destruction and displacement, as well as making the air very hot and humid.”

Good examples-

“Oliver Cromwell was well known as a member of the House of Commons and English military, though most famous for overseeing King Charles’ beheading.”

“There have been multiple incidents where the government has subjected Americans, without their knowledge or consent, to dangerous and debilitating medical experiments.”

Rule of Style #4- Explain to your readers, but not too much.

When discussing a subject in a piece of written work, the reader’s prior knowledge will have an enormous impact on their comprehension. As the author, you often have the advantage. It is important to explain ideas clearly to your audience.

However, a skilled writer always remembers that we are all part of a community. There is cultural information that is generally known and accepted. It is not necessary to explain these concepts, and may alienate your reader if you do so.

Rule of Style #5- Read your writing out loud to yourself.

If you read your writing out loud to yourself, you may hear things that do not sound right or are not clear. You may catch errors that your eye overlooked.

 

 

If you follow these rules, there is a good chance you may write sentences that work (or at least don’t end in headaches and confusion).

 

5 Responses to Style part 2 draft- A Guide to Style (or- how to write things that sound smart, yet can also be understood by others)

  1. tjsonntag says:

    Hey Christine! You didn’t leave any specifics for me to address, so I’ll going to throw it all at the wall and see what sticks, eh?

    – LOVE your stick figure drawings! I cracked up at the guy laughing while reading statements of the obvious.
    – I think you may have too much white space in your non-text elements. Those pictures could be cropped to remove the excess white, which might also make the remaining jpg bigger and easier to see.
    – The print in your graphics is awfully small… I think the font size should be increased considerably.
    – Rule #2 mentions text in italics, but I didn’t see anything italicized.
    – You’ve got lots of really great examples of what NOT to do, but the corrected, or good samples, are much fewer in number. It wouldn’t hurt to follow the directions you give for each rule and craft the revised sentence for us. I know it may seem redundant, but it might also help round out the requirements that Krause is looking for.
    – If you could come up with just one more rule and exceed the minimum, I bet it would count for a lot. :)

    I think this is awesome, I love your examples, and your stick-figure guys are just too cute. Hope this helps!!

    ~T

    • cas04044 says:

      Hey Tracey- I sat down to peer review today and just noticed the specifics part… no worries though and thanks for the commentary. The picture you sent me looks great :) I like the black and white in my drawings so I’m going to stick with that but larger text and recropping will make a huge difference, I agree. I wouldn’t have even thought of it unless you had mentioned it (I’m not computer savvy lots of times these things just don’t occur to me). I will poke around and see if I can figure it out… Thanks for the thorough feedback.

  2. tjsonntag says:

    Oh – crap – forgot the last part:
    – You’re probably already working on it, but the conclusion is a bit meager.

  3. jswriter says:

    Christine,
    I agree with Tracey on the appearance of the non text elements. Crop them a bit & bump up the font & they will be more effective.
    I also love your stick figures! The minimalist nature paired with the examples was spot on!
    Overall I like your theme and think that you did a great job of explaining your rules. Writing out examples will add to that element.

    Tracey touched on all of the little things like no italics in rule 2, so there isn’t much for me to add in that department.

    Good job so far! good luck!!
    Jess

  4. Megan says:

    First off, your stick figure drawing are awesome. As for the content, I too missed the note on specificity, so here goes:
    -I really liked that you used Rule #2 in your description of Rule #2. Your sentences were short and to the point.
    -The examples you used in Rule #3 were great. The readers are guaranteed to understand what you’re trying to describe to them.
    -I was trying to take a look at the graphics for Rule #4, and while I can see the pictures I can’t see the words all that well. If the text were a little bit bigger, even by a point size I think it would make a world of difference. As for Rule #4 itself, you make a good point, it’s very important to explain things. If you put some examples in the text and used the pictures to emphasize the point or back up your claim that would work well I think. However, that’s something you can take or leave.
    -The only other piece of advice I have for you is for you to add a bit more to your conclusion. Everything else looks quite well done!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s